A Georgia judge isn't saying she was wrong when she forbade the Philadelphia-based mega-firm Duane Morris from representing a subsidiary of McKesson Corp. in an Atlanta intellectual property dispute. But, citing changed circumstances, she's lifted her ban on the firm's involvement in the case. Focusing on the circumstances surrounding the conclusion of Duane Morris' involvement in the Pennsylvania matter, the judge concluded that the "hot potato" doctrine did not apply in this instance.
Link
- posted by Hernan at 1:08 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home