Thursday, October 26, 2006
Blood and Chocolate
Blood and Chocolate |
Balls of Fury
Balls of Fury |
Zodiac
Mr. Woodcock
Mr. Woodcock |
The Last Legion
The Last Legion |
"Saw III" set to rip up weekend box office (Reuters)
"Saw III" set to rip up weekend box office (Reuters) |
The Italian
Stomp the Yard
"Cocaine Cowboys" relives Miami's high times (Reuters)
"Cocaine Cowboys" relives Miami's high times (Reuters) |
A Halloween DVD roundup (Reuters)
A Halloween DVD roundup (Reuters) |
October home vide takes a "Stand" (Reuters)
October home vide takes a "Stand" (Reuters)
|
Notes On A Scandal - Trailer A
Notes On A Scandal - Trailer A |
Alpha Dog
Freedom Writers
Pathfinder
Liz Taylor denies plans for 9th marriage (Reuters)
Liz Taylor denies plans for 9th marriage (Reuters)
|
"Departed," "Diamond" turn Leo into a lion (Reuters)
"Departed," "Diamond" turn Leo into a lion (Reuters) |
"Bridge" sheds light on those who cross over (Reuters)
"Bridge" sheds light on those who cross over (Reuters) |
White Noise 2: The Light
White Noise 2: The Light |
Hostel 2
Happily N'Ever After
Happily N'Ever After |
Code Name: The Cleaner
Code Name: The Cleaner |
The Bridge
The Bridge |
Saw III
Saw III |
Copying Beethoven - Trailer
Copying Beethoven - Trailer |
Unaccompanied Minors - Trailer 2
Unaccompanied Minors - Trailer 2 |
Brad Pitt a wedgie jokester on set (AP)
Brad Pitt a wedgie jokester on set (AP)
|
Sharon reviews Death of a President
Sharon reviews Death of a President
Director Gabriel Range had a few words of the controversy surrounding this movie. What is entertaining about DOAP is that It?s almost like an episode of CSI, it shows what would be the protocol if this happened, and what mistakes the big guns might make in this situation. It shows the differing views of Bush, what people think is happening to America , and the upward turn in racism. The story flashes in between interviews with Bush?s fictional staff, including his speach writer and head body guard and back into the events the day he is shot. It also shows interviews with people and their families who have been accused of murdering Bush. The interviews with the accused is the most political part of the movie, they get this so right that I had goosebumps. Bush is in this movie for about 15 minutes, tops. The actual Bush getting shot scene is so fast that you don?t get to see anything, I was a bit disappointed to be honest. But the riots and protests in the street coming up to his murder are great, the director really captures a rage that many people feel towards good old George W. One of the protest signs in particular made me laugh, there is a picture of Bush and it says ?like a rock???Only dumber?. Overall this movie is watchable. But it does drag a bit. It was also predictable at times and the way they digitally put Bush into scenes was often distracting visually, although sometimes it was perfect. The directing and editing are the best part of this movie, it really does feel like a documentary and a pretty honest one plus there isn?t any over the top Bush bashing. This is a movie with an agenda, but it?s not to inspire someone to shoot Bush, it seems to be about reminding us to an open mind on issues and a dialogue about things we believe in. For a no go or routh I give this a go, but go rent it, not that there are many places to see it in theaters anyway but you will get more out of this movie if you get to form your own opinion, and aren?t distracted by the goof behind you yelling ?kill him? in the theater. On a scale of one to ten I give it a seven. |
Sharon reviews Running with Scissors
Sharon reviews Running with Scissors
How does it dance the line so perfectly? It may be because it?s based on the memoirs of Agusten Burroughs, who lived the story, or it could be because the director Ryan Murphy.(Nip/Tuck creator) also had a similar upbringing. Here?s the synopsis: A teenage Augusten Burroughs (Cross) absorbs experiences that could make for a shocking memoir: the son of an alcoholic father (Baldwin) and an unstable mother (Bening), he's handed off to his mother's therapist, Dr. Finch (Cox), and spends his adolescent years as a member of Finch's bizarre extended family.
There is some surprising casting for Burroughs gay lover in the way of Joseph Fines, believe me he is no Shakespeare in Love in this movie, he is a funny and painfully troubled man. We also get to see fabulous performances from Gwyneth Paltrow, the delicious Evan Rachel Woods, Alec Baldwin, Brian Cox and the lovable Joseph Cross as Augusten Burroughs. One of the biggest reasons the chemistry was so good in this movie I think has to do with Murphy. He allowed a lot of improv, said that Brian Cox in particular gave a lot of scene?s some extra spice with good improvisation. Sharp dialogue, darkly comedic with drama at just the right moments, Running with Scissors is a fantastic dark comedic drama. I loved this movie, it?s a great ensemble cast and I?m giving it a nine out of ten, for a no go or routh it?s a total routh. |
Lord Of The Rings - Why Fantasy Failed To Make A Resurgence
Lord Of The Rings - Why Fantasy Failed To Make A Resurgence
So along came the Oscars, and now no film is history has more awards... ROTK won 11 Oscars that night... winning in every single category it was nominated for. I was beside myself with joy since a lot of pundits said the Academy wouldn't actually honor a fantasy film. They were wrong. REALLY wrong. But then, after all the gold, a new popular saying started to emerge over the following weeks. The buzz was now that fantasy films would make a HUGE resurgence and that all the studios would start working hard to develop tentpole fantasy genre films. Film geeks who are fans of fantasy (like myself) were all looking forward now to what the future would bring. Surely there were be a massive upswing in Sci-Fi and in particular FANTASY films going into production right? But there was a problem... Many people suggested that the massive success of ROTK would OPEN THE DOOR to the fantasy genre for studios. Seems to make sense right? The problem for fantasy, is that ROTK was a little TOO SUCCESSFUL. ROTK didn't swing the door open for fantasy... it slammed the door shut. I remember this discussion on The Audio Edition once where I asked the question: "Was Return of the King so successful that now studios may shy away from making more fantasy films out of fear of it being compared to Return of the King, or even worse, that the general movie going public may just see the new movies as Lord of the Rings rip offs?" So here we are now... nearly 3 years later... and the great resurgence of the fantasy genre never materialized. Yes, there was Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe, and while I thought it was a fantastic film, it was almost more "fairy tale" than fantasy (yes yes yes, I know I'm playing with semantics here, but I think it's a valid observation). But even if we concede Narnia as a true fantasy film, then that only really gives us 1 film in 3 years. Hardly the great resurgence many people predicted. So now here we are, approaching the end of 2006 and a great looking film, Eragon, is almost set to be released (December 15th in North America). And sure enough, as good as the film looks, many people are already jumping on the "It's a LOTR rip off" bandwagon. A bandwagon that is really based on nothing but the fact that the film is in the same genre as Lord of the Rings. That's it. It's like saying "The 40 Year Old Virgin is a rip of off Animal House because they're both comedies". I have not read Eragon, but those I know what have read both Eragon and LOTR assure me they are quite different stories... but they are indeed the same genre, and sadly, it looks like the great success of Return of the King hasn't opened the doors for the genre... it, unintentionally, has taken sole possession of it to the exclusion of all others. Lets hope the next 3 years will see a change in that. |
Shrek 3 Princesses
I've mentioned before that I"m a fan of the Shrek films (I'm even one of the few people who actually enjoyed the second one even more... it's wasn't quite as GOOD as the first one... but I was a little more entertained by it). From what I know, this is the first official image from Shrek 3 (AKA Shrek The Thrid).
To see an evenlarger and higher quality version, you can just go here. |
The Hobbit Not A Sure Thing?
Yesterday I was reading a news blurb on the whole thing from the good folks over at Moiveweb... and in the middle of chat about Terminator 4, this little bit appeared: (MGM chief operating officer Rick Sands) is in discussions with New Line Cinema to get the rights to produce two prequel films to "The Lord of the Rings" series, based on J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit, he said. Other projects he mentioned include a sequel to "The Thomas Crown Affair," set to star Pierce Brosnan, and a remake of "Dirty Rotten Scoundrels", according to The Hollywood Reporter.Wait a second. What was that?!?! He's still "in negotiations"!?!?! The previous releases seemed to suggest this was a done deal. Now it's "still in negotiations"? Oh good grief, please someone tell me we're not looking at another Indiana Jones 4 situation here... talk and talk and talk and never get an actuall bloody movie. I have a bad feeling about this. |
'Rambo' returns, on location in Thailand (AP)
'Rambo' returns, on location in Thailand (AP)
|
Imax will bring "Museum" to life (Reuters)
Imax will bring "Museum" to life (Reuters) |
Houdini inspires kids' magic film (Reuters)
McDermott, Graham on "Texas" map (Reuters)
McDermott, Graham on "Texas" map (Reuters) |
Bacon, Harden reunite for Clint's daughter (Reuters)
Bacon, Harden reunite for Clint's daughter (Reuters) |








If your childhood wasn?t perfect you are going to like
It's hard to believe it's already been 3 years since The Lord Of The Rings: The Return of the King was in theaters. To this day I still call it the overall single greatest achievement in the art of filmmaking. Many disagree, and that's ok, but to me when you look at all aspects of modern filmmaking, all the different pieces that goes into it... nothing scores higher in more of those areas than Return of the King did.
As you know, a little while back I reported that MGM was moving ahead with plans for making The Hobbit, which got all of us film fans totally buzzing, and well we should. News is that they're going to break The Hobbit movie into 2 separate parts, which is also good news (to me anyway). So everything is right in the world... or is it?